Pengaruh Perkembangan Teknologi 4.0 terhadap Transformasi Logistik Modern TNI Angkatan Laut dalam Mendukung Kesiapan Operasional Alutsista
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54082/jupin.1939Kata Kunci:
AHP, Delphi, Kesiapan Operasional, Transformasi Logistik, Teknologi 4.0, TNI Angkatan LautAbstrak
TNI Angkatan Laut memiliki kebutuhan logistik yang kompleks dan dinamis, realitas menunjukkan bahwa sistem logistik TNI Angkatan Laut masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan struktural dan fungsional. Penelitian pada artikel ilmiah ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pengaruh perkembangan teknologi 4.0 terhadap transformasi logistik modern TNI Angkatan Laut dalam mendukung kesiapan operasional alutsista. Pendekatan yang digunakan menggabungkan metode Delphi untuk memperoleh konsensus pakar dan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) untuk menetapkan prioritas elemen teknologi yang paling berpengaruh. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa teknologi seperti predictive maintenance, sistem ERP logistik terintegrasi, dan otomatisasi distribusi memiliki kontribusi dominan dalam meningkatkan efisiensi, kecepatan dan keandalan sistem logistik militer. Dimensi smart logistics menjadi prioritas utama dalam struktur keputusan yang menandakan pentingnya pendekatan logistik berbasis prediksi dan otomatisasi. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa transformasi logistik TNI Angkatan Laut tidak hanya bergantung pada penerapan teknologi digital, tetapi juga memerlukan dukungan kelembagaan yang adaptif dan penguatan kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia. Keberhasilan implementasi teknologi 4.0 dalam sistem logistik sangat ditentukan oleh sinergi antara inovasi teknologi, integrasi sistem informasi dan kesiapan organisasi dalam menghadapi perubahan. Dengan strategi yang tepat, transformasi ini diharapkan mampu membentuk sistem logistik TNI Aangkatan Laut yang modern, tangguh dan responsif terhadap tuntutan operasi maritim masa kini dan mendatang.
Referensi
Arifin, F. M. (2024). The Concept of Digital-Based Military Logistics Supply Chain Management: Strengthening Accuracy and Speed As Well As Transparency and Accountability. STTAL POSTGRADUATE-INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 8(1), 207–217.
Çalık, A. (2021). A novel Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection in the Industry 4.0 era. Soft Computing, 25(3), 2253–2265.
Chakrabarty, A., & Chuan, T. K. (2009). An exploratory qualitative and quantitative analysis of Six Sigma in service organizations in Singapore. Management Research News, 32(7), 614–632. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170910965224
Chuang, Y. F., Chia, S. H., & Wong, J. Y. (2013). Supply chain alliance factors evaluation by the Delphi-AHP method. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 10(2), 69–79.
Cimini, C., Boffelli, A., Lagorio, A., Kalchschmidt, M., & Pinto, R. (2021). How do Industry 4.0 Technologies Influence Organisational Change? An Empirical Analysis of Italian SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(3), 695–721. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2019-0135
James, K. L., Randall, N. P., & Haddaway, N. R. (2016). A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences. Environmental Evidence, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0059-6
Kostiuchenko, L., & Kostiuchenko, A. (2020). The logistical support system elements for the preparedness for military operations. Electronic Scientific Journal Intellectualization of Logistics and Supply Chain Management #1 2020, 2(2), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.46783/smart-scm/2020-2-2
Lange, T., Kopkow, C., Lützner, J., Günther, K. P., Gravius, S., Scharf, H. P., Stöve, J., Wagner, R., & Schmitt, J. (2020). Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: Different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-0912-8
Madhani, P. (2010). Resource Based View (RBV) of Competitive Advantage RESOURCE BASED VIEW: CONCEPTS AND PRACTICES. Icfai University Press, 3–22. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1578704
Melawati, F. (2025). Human Resource Management Training In The Digital Era For Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises (MSMES). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIETY REVIEWS, 3(3), 1–10.
Mikhailov, L., & Singh, M. G. (1999). Comparison analysis of methods for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1, 1037–1042. https://doi.org/10.1109/icsmc.1999.814236
Mohammadi, A., & Mohammadi, S. (2021). Providing a Conceptual Model for the Innovation Strategy By Using Scenariobased Technology Roadmap in Context of Smart Logistic System. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, Suppl. Special Issue 3, 25(January 2021), 1–12. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/providing-conceptual-model-innovation-strategy/docview/2585992069/se-2?accountid=14774%0Ahttps://utuvolter.fi/openurl/358FIN_UTUR/358FIN_UTUR:VU1??url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&gen
Octaviana, S. L. (2024). Manajemen Logistik Pertahanan Era Society 5.0 (Issue November).
Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process (Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation). Mc Graw-Hill Book Company.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98.
Suryawan, A. (2023). Optimization of Logistics Support on Natuna Island as a Base Carrier in Uploading the Sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia. International Journal of Social and Management …, 4(4), 18–25. https://www.ijosmas.org/index.php/ijosmas/article/view/335%0Ahttps://www.ijosmas.org/index.php/ijosmas/article/download/335/252
Widodo, S. I. P., & Sos, S. (2025). Memimpin Tentara Di Era Society 5.0; Sebuah Gagasan Strategis Tentang Kepemimpinan Militer Berbasis Algoritmic Leadership. Nas Media Pustaka.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Pramono Sigit Raharjo
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
