Integrasi Civic Discourse dalam PPKn di Sekolah Dasar: Studi Kasus Kualitatif Penalaran Kritis dan Tanggung Jawab Sosial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54082/jupin.2146Kata Kunci:
Civic discourse, pembelajaran PPKn, sekolah dasar, penalaran kritis, tanggung jawab sosialAbstrak
Praktik dialog kewargaan dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (PPKn) di sekolah dasar masih cenderung terbatas, sehingga belum sepenuhnya mendukung pengembangan penalaran kritis dan tanggung jawab sosial peserta didik secara optimal. Kondisi tersebut berimplikasi pada rendahnya kualitas partisipasi siswa dalam diskusi kelas serta belum terbentuknya ruang belajar yang deliberatif dan reflektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara mendalam bagaimana integrasi civic discourse diterapkan dalam pembelajaran PPKn di sekolah dasar serta kontribusinya terhadap penguatan penalaran kritis dan tanggung jawab sosial peserta didik.Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus intrinsik. Subjek penelitian meliputi guru PPKn, peserta didik kelas IV dan V, serta kepala sekolah. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi partisipatif, wawancara mendalam, dan analisis dokumentasi, kemudian dianalisis secara tematik dengan bantuan perangkat lunak MAXQDA.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa civic discourse berperan penting dalam membangun ruang deliberatif di kelas, mendorong berkembangnya penalaran reflektif, memperkuat kemampuan siswa menilai dan menyusun alasan, serta menumbuhkan kesadaran sosial dalam interaksi belajar. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa kualitas dialog kelas tidak hanya ditentukan oleh strategi instruksional, tetapi juga oleh iklim sosial-emosional yang aman dan inklusif. Secara ilmiah, penelitian ini berkontribusi memperkaya kajian empiris pendidikan kewargaan dengan menunjukkan bahwa civic discourse merupakan mekanisme pedagogis yang relevan untuk memperkuat pembelajaran PPKn dan pembentukan karakter kewargaan di jenjang sekolah dasar.
Referensi
Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08317501
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
Bila, N. S., Wahyuni, F. D., & Nurgiansah, T. H. (2023). Peran penting civics: Pendidikan ilmu kewarganegaraan di era masyarakat digital. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 20(1), 1–12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369718073_Peran_Penting_Civics_Pendidikan_Ilmu_Kewarganegaraan_di_Era_Masyarakat_Digital
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bronte-Tinkew, J., Carrano, J., Horowitz, A., & Kinukawa, A. (2008). Aggravation and Stress in Parenting: Associations with Coparenting and Father Engagement Among Resident Fathers. Journal of Family Issues. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09340147
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage. https://cmc.marmot.org/Record/.b57516595
Decristan, J., Jansen, N. C., & Fauth, B. (2023). Student Participation in Whole-Class Discourse: Individual Conditions and Consequences for Student Learning in Primary and Secondary School. Learning and Instruction, 86, 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101748
Ekström, L. (2024). Between compassion, anger, resignation, and rebellion: Vocational civics teachers and their struggle to fulfil the intentions of the civics subject. Journal of Social Science Education, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.11576/jsse-6757
Erickson, B., Dunbar, R., Winchip, J., & Ayebo, A. (2025). Reluctance to Speak in College Classrooms: Academic Causes and Consequences. Social Psychology of Education, 28, 104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10063-3
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. https://www.etsu.edu/teaching/documents/whatwhy.pdf
Facione, P. A. (2023). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. https://insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts.pdf
Flick, U. (2007). Designing qualitative research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208826
Gutmann, A. (1999). Democratic education (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. https://archive.org/details/democraticeducat0000gutm
Hanafi, A. M., & Minsih, M. (2022). Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Sebagai Transformasi Pendidikan di Sekolah Dasar. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(2), 204–220. https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v10n2.p204–220
Hidayah, N. (2023). Dialog reflektif sebagai strategi pembelajaran dalam membentuk karakter siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 13(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.1208
Hoskins, B., & Crick, R. D. (2010). Competences for learning to learn and active citizenship: Different currencies or two sides of the same coin? European Journal of Education, 45(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2009.01419.x
Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi. (2022). Dimensi, elemen, dan subelemen Profil Pelajar Pancasila pada Kurikulum Merdeka (Versi 2). Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/V.2-Dimensi-elemen-subelemen-Profil-Pelajar-Pancasila-pada-Kurikulum-Merdeka.pdf
Kitcher, S. (2025). Igniting Passion for Discussion and Democratizing Classrooms: Discussions and Democracy—Motivation, Growth, and the New Social Studies Classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 53(2), 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2025.2484293
Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA: Text, audio, and video. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15671-8
Levine, P. (2016). Civic Education and Deeper Learning. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED559676.pdf
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Lyiscott, J., De Los Ríos, C. V, & Clark, C. H. (2023). Case Studies of Effective Learning Climates for Civic Reasoning and Discussion. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 705(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162231178627
McAvoy, P., & Hess, D. (2015). Classroom deliberation in an era of political polarization. Curriculum Inquiry, 43(3), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12000
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
National Academy of Education. (2021). Educating for Civic Reasoning and Discourse. National Academy of Education. https://naeducation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/NAEd-Educating-for-Civic-Reasoning-and-Discourse.pdf
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://aulasvirtuales.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods-by-michael-patton.pdf
Šeďová, K., & Sedláček, M. (2023). How Vocal and Silent Forms of Participation in Combination Relate to Student Achievement. Instructional Science, 51(2), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09609-1
Šeďová, K., Sedláček, M., Salamounová, Z., Lintner, T., Svaricek, R., & Vlček, J. (2025). Let Them All Talk: Equitable Participation in Classroom Dialogue as a Result of an Intervention Programme. Language and Education, 39(6), 1471–1489. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2025.2454637
Spall, S. (1998). Peer debriefing in qualitative research: Emerging operational models. Qualitative Inquiry, 4(2), 280–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049800400208
UNESCO. (2015). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232993
Wang, P., Chen, F., Wang, D., & others. (2025). Enhancing Students’ Dialogic Reflection through Classroom Discourse Visualisation. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 20, 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09443-2
White, G., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2024). Supporting Civic Reasoning, Discourse, and Problem Solving That Is Political without Being Partisan. Review of Research in Education, 47(1), 568–605. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X231219989
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Tety Nur Cholifah, Intan Rahmawati, Ade Ricky Rozzaqi, Siswanto Siswanto
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
